The Supreme Court Ruling on Taxpayer Funding for Private and/or Religious Schools
In a string of new cases being ruled on by the United States Supreme Court, the Court contemplated whether or not Montana’s revenue department legally banned tax-credit scholarships that went to religious schools. In a narrow 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court held Montana’s tax credit program could not exclude religious schools.
The Background of the Ban on Taxpayer Funding Benefiting Religious Schools in Montana
In 2015, Montana legislature allowed residents to receive tax credit up to a certain amount for contribution to a scholarship program for kids. The donations were then used to fund tuition scholarships for children who wished to go to private school. Unsurprisingly, many private schools carry some sort of religious affiliation.
Soon after the start of this program, the Montana Department of Revenue excluded religiously affiliated schools, citing constitutional concerns. The Montana Supreme Court invalidated the entire program, holding that the state Constitution prohibits funding to religious schools.
Arguments For and Against Allowing Religious Schools to Benefit from Taxpayer Funding
The Institute for Justice petitioned the United States Supreme Court to rule on the issue, citing violations of the equal protection clause of the federal constitution. The Department of Justice joined in on behalf of the Plaintiffs, arguing that the Montana Supreme Court violated the free exercise clause of the First Amendment.
The State of Montana argued that it was constitutional as it kept church and state apart. It was adequately balancing the liberties of free exercise of religion while balancing freedom from religion.
Key Opinions from the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of the United States held that the Montana State Supreme Court erred in prohibiting funds from going to religious schools. In reaching its opinion, Chief Justice Roberts reasoned that the Court “accept the Montana Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law…and we assess whether excluding religious schools and affected families from that program was consistent with the Federal Constitution.” Espi noza, et al. v. Montana Department of Revenue, et al. No. 18-1195, pg. 7 (2020). The Court further reasoned that the prohibition was based in religious status and not religious use. Status based discrimination remains status based even if its goals is to prevent the aid from being used for religious purposes. Applying strict scrutiny, the toughest form of judicial review, the Court held that the State of Montana’s bar on religious schools receiving aid discriminates based on religious status.
Justice Thomas and Justice Gorsuch, in their concurring opinion, that this case involves the Free Exercise Clause and not the Establishment clause. As a result, the law was reinstated. The Judgment of the Montana Supreme Court was reversed and sent back for further proceedings that were in accordance with the United States Supreme Court’s ruling.
An Overview of the Ruling
Paying attention to current events and want to understand more about the United States Supreme Court’s ruling on the state ban on private and/or religious school funding? Here’s an overview:
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court held Montana’s tax credit program could not exclude religious schools
In 2015, Montana allowed residents to receive tax credits for a contribution to a scholarship program for kids that benefited private religious schools
The Montana Supreme Court invalidated the program holding that the state Constitution prohibits funding to religious schools
The Judgment of the Montana Supreme Court was reversed and sent back for further proceedings that were in accordance with the United States Supreme Court’s ruling
Complex Ideas, Clear Explanations
At the Kryder Law Group, we pride ourselves on feedback we’ve received from our clients that we are easy to talk to and provide clear explanations to complex ideas. Whether we’re analyzing current events like this Supreme Court case or helping you understand what to expect in your own Cook County case, our goal is to make it easy for you to understand. When you have a legal issue you need help with, our experienced attorneys are ready to help you figure out your next steps.
If you have questions of law or were injured due to someone’s negligence, do not hesitate to reach out to us at the Kryder Law Group by phone at 312-223-1700, by email at email@example.com, or through the interactive chat client on our website for a free and confidential consultation. The facts that are specific and unique to your situation will determine whether you are entitled to compensation under the law and whether you can recover monetary damages. It is important to contact our office soon because under Illinois law, there is a limited amount of time to file a lawsuit against the negligent party. We know injuries are incredibly stressful, so please read the positive reviews on our Google page and see how we’ve helped countless others handle similar injuries.